MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA DISTRICT PATIALA THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER v. MALKEET SINGH AND OTHERS
LPA/619/2026 · 2026-07-21
Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34459 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34459 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
LPA-481-2026(O&M) and connected matters
1 | P a g e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(273+277) Date of Decision:- 21.07.2026
273/1
LPA-481-2026 (O&M)
THE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION AMRITSAR THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER
……Appellant(s)
Versus
KANWALJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ……Respondent(s)
273/2
LPA-601-2026 (O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
……Appellant(s)
Versus
SUNNY KUMAR AND OTHERS ……Respondent(s)
273/3
LPA-633-2026 (O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA DISTRICT PATIALA THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
……Appellant(s)
Versus
PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS ……Respondent(s)
SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 14:17 I am the author of this document
LPA-481-2026(O&M) and connected matters
2 | P a g e
273/4
LPA-852-2026 (O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA DIST PATIALA THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
……Appellant(s)
Versus
JAGDISH KUMAR AND OTHERS ……Respondent(s)
273/5
LPA-842-2026 (O&M)
THE MUNCIPAL CORP. AMRITSAR THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND ANR
……Appellant(s)
Versus
TEJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ……Respondent(s)
273/6
LPA-853-2026 (O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MALERKOTLA
……Appellant(s)
Versus
HARJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ……Respondent(s)
273/7
LPA-1095-2026 (O&M)
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NANGAL ……Appellant(s)
Versus TILAK RAJ & OTHERS SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 14:17 I am the author of this document
LPA-481-2026(O&M) and connected matters
3 | P a g e
……Respondent(s)
273/8
LPA-717-2026 (O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, KHARAR ……Appellant(s)
Versus
GURJINDER MOHAN SINGH & OTHERS ……Respondent(s)
277/1
LPA-619-2026(O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA, DISTRICT PATIALA
……Appellant(s)
Versus
MALKEET SINGH AND OTHERS
……Respondent(s)
277/2
LPA-634-2026(O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA, DISTRICT PATIALA
……Appellant(s)
Versus
MANJEET SINGH AND OTHERS
……Respondent(s) 277/3
LPA-656-2026(O&M)
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA, DISTRICT PATIALA
……Appellant(s)
Versus
PALWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 14:17 I am the author of this document
LPA-481-2026(O&M) and connected matters
4 | P a g e
……Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate of the appellant(s)
in LPA-1095-2026. Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocate and
Ms. Vikramjit Kaur Soni, Advocate for the appellant(s)
in LPA-481-2026 and LPA-842-2026. Mr. D.S. Randhawa, Advocate,
for the appellant(s) in LPA Nos.619, 634 and 656 of 2026. Mr. Abhishek Singla, Advocate for the respondents
in LPA-481-2026 and LPA-482-2026. Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate for the respondents
in LPA-633-2026. Ms. Aruna Sachdeva, Advocate for
respondent No. 2 in LPA-853-2026. Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate for respondent No. 1
in LPA-717-2026. Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advocate,
for respondent No.1 in LPA-1095-2026. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab,
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
CM-1507-LPA-2026 in LPA-601-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 118 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 118 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 14:17 I am the author of this document
LPA-481-2026(O&M) and connected matters
5 | P a g e
CM-1577-LPA-2026 in LPA-633-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 97 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 97 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. CM-2675-LPA-2026 in LPA-1095-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 45 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 45 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. CM-2676-LPA-2026 in LPA-1095-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 45 days in re-filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 45 days in re-filing the present appeal is condoned. CM-1796-LPA-2026 in LPA-717-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 89 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 89 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.
SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 14:17 I am the author of this document
LPA-481-2026(O&M) and connected matters
6 | P a g e
CM-1543-LPA-2026 in LPA-619-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 113 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 113 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. CM-1579-LPA-2026 in LPA-634-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 113 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 113 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. CM-1641-LPA-2026 in LPA-656-2026
Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 113 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 113 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. Main cases
1. By this common order, eleven letter patent appeals, the details of which have been given in the heading, are being decided as both these appeals involve the same question of law on similar facts. 2. Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate appears on behalf of respondent No.1 in LPA-717-2026 and files power of attorney on his behalf. The same is taken on record. SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 14:17 I am the author of this document
LPA-481-2026(O&M) and connected matters
7 | P a g e
3.
Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the issue raised in the present appeals has already been decided by this Court while deciding LPA No. 1065 of 2026 titled as ‘Municipal Council Malerkotla thorugh its Executive Officer vs. Kuldeep Singh and Others’ on 10.07.2026 and the present appeals be also dismissed in same terms.
4.
Ordered accordingly.
5.
Civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands
disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
JUDGE
July 21, 2026
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) Shubham
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether reportable : No
SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 14:17 I am the author of this document