Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34455 (KAR)

SRI G VENKATESH v. BHARATHIYA RESERVE BANK

WP/22910/2026 · 2026-07-30

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010509012026 NC: 2026:KHC:39987 WP No. 22910 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 22910 OF 2026 (S-TR) BETWEEN: SRI G VENKATESH S/O. GOPALA RAJU D AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT. NO.34, SRINIDHI NILAYA, MCD LAYOUT, SRIRAMPURA 2ND STAGE, MYSURU - 570 023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGENDRA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BHARATHIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRANA PRIVATE LIMITED OFFICE AT NOTE MUDRAN NAGAR, MYSORE - 570 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BHARATIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN PRIVATE LIMITED, OFFICE AT NO.3 AND 4, 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, B.T.M. LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 029 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R V S NAYAK, ADVOCATE (VK NOT FILED)) Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010509012026 NC: 2026:KHC:39987 WP No. 22910 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED TRANSFER LETTER DATED 16.05.2026 BEARING SL. NO. BNM NO. 1116/(M)04.14.02/2026-27, ISSUED BY THE R1 AS PER ANNX- E, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.07.2026 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO RETAIN THE PETITIONER IN MYSORE UNIT AS PER ANNX-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will not press prayer No.1. 2. The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 18.07.2026, wherein the petitioner requested the respondents to retain the petitioner in Mysore unit as per Annexure-F. The respondents did not pass any order on the said representation. Hence, this writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010509012026 NC: 2026:KHC:39987 WP No. 22910 of 2026 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, if reasonable time is granted, the respondents will consider Annexure-F and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the representation vide Annexure-F and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of one week from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. 5. Pending application/s, if any, shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB