{1} 50-wp-9927-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 50 WRIT PETITION NO. 9927 OF 2026 Sonali Nitin Lodha VERSUS State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Ajinky Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N.S. Tekale, AGP for State Mr. Sayyed Tauseef Yaseen, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. This petition challenges notice issued by Respondent No. 3 under Section 54 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Perusal of notice shows that the notice is as vague as it could be. Whatsoever no details are mentioned in the said notice. 2. The notices dated 03.08.2025 and 29.04.2026 are hereby quashed and set aside. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to Respondents to give fresh notice by giving particulars and details. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde 2026:BHC-AUG:36552-DB