IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17088 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2020 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Harendra Sah S/o- Late Dhrup Sah Resident of village- Sisahani P.S.- Pakaridayal District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar No. 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 09-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 04.06.2020, at 06:00 p.m., 13 named accused persons including women accused came and started absuing. On objection, Suraj Sah assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on his head, while Upendra Sah assaulted Urmila Devi, the wife of the informant by rod causing injury on her head and Uma Shankar Sah assaulted Brij Kishore Sah, the brother of the informant by lathi causing injury on his head and Vipendra Sah assaulted Ramdev Sah, the another brother of the informant by lathi causing injury and all the accused persons assaulted Kiran Devi and snatched her earrings worth Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17088 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026 2/2 Rs.22,000/-, on alarm villagers gathered and saved them and the injured were taken to the hospital. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assault is alleged against the named accused persons and as far as petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is general and omnibus in nature. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 121 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T