Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3444 (AP)

M/s. Ayyappa Agencies, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9931/2026 · 2026-06-18

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010178902026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 9931/2026 Between: 1. M/S. AYYAPPA AGENCIES,, D.NO. 4 VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, PAPPULA SITA RAMIREDDY, S/O. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED 67 YEARS, R/O. 4 3RD LINE, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNT PRADESH. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE MANDADAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PR REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 9931/2026 M/S. AYYAPPA AGENCIES,, D.NO. 4-5-29/38/15/B, 3RD LINE, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, PAPPULA SITA RAMIREDDY, S/O. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED 67 YEARS, R/O. 4 3RD LINE, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. THE MANDADAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PR REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-522237. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY 29/38/15/B, 3RD LINE, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, PAPPULA SITA RAMIREDDY, S/O. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED 67 YEARS, R/O. 4-5-29/38/15/B, UR DISTRICT, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT, PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, THE MANDADAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 522237. 522237. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the undisputed amount payable to the petitioner for supply of piped water supply of piped water supply parts (PWS) and PH articles for the year 2024-2025 through work order dated 20.07.2024 vide Credit Bill No. 80 for an amount of Rs. 2,49,985/- for the supply of sanitation works materials and the same was acknowledged by the 3rd respondent with interest @ 24percent per annum from the date of supply of the material to till the date of payment is arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal against the provisions of the contract and in violation of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India consequentially direct the respondents 1 to 3 to pay the bills through work order dated 20.07.2024 vide Credit Bill No. 80 for an amount of Rs. 2,49,985/- by the 3rd respondent along with interest @ 24percent per annum to the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to pay the bills through work order dated 20.07.2024 vide Credit Bill No.80 for an amount of Rs. 2,49,985/- by the 3rd respondent along with interest @ 24percent per annum to the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHETAN PONNURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3. Mattegunta Sudhir, Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer: “…to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the undisputed amount payable to the petitioner for supply of piped water supply parts (PWS) and PH articles for the year 2024-2025 through work order dated 20.07.2024 vide Credit Bill No. 80 for an amount of Rs. 2,49,985/- for the supply of sanitation works materials and the same was acknowledged by the 3rd respondent with interest @ 24% per annum from the date of supply of the material to till the date of payment is arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal against the provisions of the contract and in violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to pay the bills through work order dated 20.07.2024 vide Credit Bill No. 80 for an amount of Rs.2,49,985/- by the 3rd respondent along with interest @ 24% per annum to the petitioner and to pass…” 2. The petitioner firm is engaged in the business of supplying of PWS Articles and sanitation materials on both wholesale and retail basis, including supplies to the Gram panchayats upon their requisition, after obtaining necessary licenses from the competent authorities for carrying on such business. While so, respondent No.3 issued work orders dated 20.07.2024 for supply of the materials required for Public Water Scheme and Sanitation works pertaining to the years 2024-2025 relating to the respondent No.3-Gram 4 panchayat. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner supplied the required materials and the receipt thereof was duly acknowledged by the respondent No.3-Gram panchayat. The grievance of the petitioner is that notwithstanding the supply of the materials to the respondent No.3-Gram panchayat, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 are not releasing the funds to the respondent No.3-Gram panchayat for the purpose of making payment to the petitioner for the last three years. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner herein to direct the respondents to pay the bills through work order dated 20.07.2024 vide Credit Bill No.80 for an amount of Rs.2,49,985/- along with interest @ 24% per annum. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3, on written instructions, submits that the petitioner supplied sanitation materials sanctioned under G.P. General Funds and is entitled for an amount of Rs.2,49,985/-. However, due to lack of sufficient funds with the Gram panchayat, the said amount could not be released till date. He further submits that the in view of some financial constraints being faced by the respondent No.3-Gram panchayat, it undertakes to pay the entire amount to the petitioner, subject to availability of funds after meeting the necessary expenditure towards sanitation and water maintenance. The written instructions are placed on record. 5 5. Having regard to the fact that there is no dispute with regard to the supply of sanitation work materials by the petitioner and the amount payable to him, and in view of the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3, the respondent authorities are directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,49,985/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-Five only) to the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 19.06.2026 Anr 6 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.9931 of 2026 Date: 19.06.2026 anr