Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3443 (AP)

NARIKELAPU BUDEIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28174/2025 · 2026-06-22

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of uploading : 29.06.2026 APHC010539432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 28174/2025 Between: 1. NARIKELAPU BUDEIAH, S/O PERAIAH, AGED 54 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.6-1A, RAMULAVARI VEEDI, GUTTIKONDA VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT PAY AND ACCOUNTS, LINGAMGUNTIA, NARASARAOPET,PALNADU DISTRICT. 2 SRK, J WP.No.28174 of 2025 5. THE GUTHIKONDA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GUTHIKONDA VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. THE KARALAPADU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KARALAPADU VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action, things and deeds of Respondents in not paying the contract bill amounts to the Petitioner i.e., Rs.6,66,019/- and also not paying the With held amount of Rs.37,304/- for the works executed by the Petitioner, which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against to the Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondents to pay the total bill amounts of Rs.7,03,323/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Three Thousand Three Hundred and Twenty Three Only) along with interest for the works carried by the Petitioner and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents forthwith to pay the total bill amounts of Rs.7,03,323/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Three Thousand Three Hundred and Twenty Three Only) along with interest in respect of works carried by the Petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANIKANTA THOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 SRK, J WP.No.28174 of 2025 O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action, things and deeds of Respondents in not paying the contract bill amounts to the Petitioner i.e., Rs.6,66,019/- and also not paying the withheld amount of Rs.37,304/- for the works executed by the Petitioner, which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against to the principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondents to pay the total bill amounts of Rs.7,03,323/- along with interest for the works carried by the Petitioner and pass such other order…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development and learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat. 3. The petitioner claims to be a registered contractor engaged in the execution of works undertaken by the Panchayat Raj Department and the Roads & Buildings Department through the tender process. It is his case that he was awarded a contract for execution of the work viz., construction of internal CC road with drains in BC Colony of Guthikonda Village of Piduguralla Mandal, NWL location from R&B Road to Thota Laxmi Narasaiah house in Guthikonda Village of Piduguralla mandal and providing additional amenities to Community Hall at SC (Mala) colony in Karalapadu Village of Piduguralla Mandal. The petitioner further states that he deposited the requisite security amount and completed the works to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite successful completion of the work, the admitted bill amount of Rs.6,66,019/- and also withheld amount of Rs.37,304/- have not been paid, causing severe financial hardship. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent authorities in releasing the legitimate dues, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 4 SRK, J WP.No.28174 of 2025 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the major portion of the amounts have been paid by the respondent authorities, besides that an amount of Rs.37,304/- has to be paid to the petitioner herein. 6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, on written instructions received from the Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Narasaraopet – 3rd respondent, submitted that there is no dispute with regard to the execution of the work by the petitioner. It is stated that an amount of Rs.10,48,453/- has already been paid to the petitioner and that a further sum of Rs.37,304/- remains payable after effecting statutory deductions amounting to Rs.57,499/-. It is further submitted that a proposal for release of the requisite grant has been forwarded to the competent authorities for payment of the balance amount to the petitioner and that the same is expected to be released within a period of three months. The written instructions are taken on record. 7. In view of the undisputed execution of the work and the admitted liability, the respondent authorities are directed to pay Rs.37,304/- to the petitioner within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 23.06.2026. MS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑ 5 SRK, J WP.No.28174 of 2025 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No:28174 of 2025 Date: 23.06.2026 MS