Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34423 (MAD)

S. Lurdhumarry v. Muthumurugan

CONT P(MD)/1369/2026 · 2026-06-12

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CONT P(MD) NO. 1369 of 2026 S. Lurdhumarry Petitioner(s) Vs Muthumurugan, The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office Aathur Taluk Dindigul District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Vignesh Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Saravanan, Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent in accordance with law for having disobeyed the order dated 16.12.2025 passed by this Court in WP(MD) No.35903 of 2025. ORDER The petitioner filed the writ petition for Mandamus to direct the respondent to complete the enquiry. This Court without expressing any opinion on merits directed the respondent to complete the enquiry. 2.Today, it is submitted that the enquiry has been completed and the order dated 15.05.2026 has been passed stating that the petitioner is not entitled to individual patta, since a third person is in occupation. Further, the joint pattadhars are entitled to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the property and there is no partition. If the petitioner is aggrieved, the petitioner ought to challenge the same. 3.Therefore, the contempt petition is closed, with liberty to challenge the order, dated 15.05.2026. 12-06-2026 Tmg To The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office Aathur Taluk Dindigul District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis