IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11318 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-494 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Shyam Sundar Rai Son of Late Sobhit Rai Resident of Village- Vishanpur Paltu, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 494 of 2024, instituted for the offences under Sections 109, 123, 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Earlier vide order dated 28.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18296 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the nature and gravity of the offence. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.12.2024 without any rhymes or reason. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11318 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 of bail. 6. There is no fresh ground to consider the bail petition of the petitioner. 7. In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected. 8. Considering the submission made on behalf of petitioner, it appears that case has not been committed to the Court of session. Hence, the learned trial court is directed to take steps for commitment of the case and conclude the trial expeditiously. manish/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T