Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34411 (KAR)

SMT GEETHA C M v. SRI K ALLAHBAKSHA

MFA/8576/2024 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T. AND SRI NAMAN VANKDARI M., MEMBER MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8576 OF 2024 (MV-I) (LOK-ADALAT NO.349 OF 2026) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GEETHA C M W/O LATE D SHIVASWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 2. SRI. ULLAS B S W/O LATE D. SHIVASWAMY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 610 AIG HUDCO, SUBRAMANYA NAGARA HEBBAL 2ND STAGE, MYSURU ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI GIREESHA S N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI K ALLAHBAKSHA S/O KADAR SAHEB K AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.11-237/1 HALEPETE LAKSHMINAGARA COLONY PALIMANERA CHITTUR CHITTUR ANDRA PRADESH-517 408 2. SRI SHEIK HUSSAIN S/O S JABBAR SAB AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT 12-157 T.T.D KALYANA MANDIRA PUGANOOR TOWN CHITTUR DISTRICT ANDRAPRADESH-517247 Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 3. CHOLAMADALAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. BRANCH OFFICE C-1 SIGMA COMPLEX 1ST FLOOR, NEW KANTHARAJ URS ROAD KUVEMPU NAGAR, MYSURU-570 023 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAYAKUMAR D., ADVOCATE, FOR R-3) * * * THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED.07.06.2023 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.1047 OF 2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL JUDGE AND MEMBER, M.A.C.T., MYSURU PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the appellants-claimants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants-claimants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its Authorised Officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees three lakh and fifty thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3 3. The respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks' from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. 5. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed off in terms of the joint memo. The judgment and award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KVK