IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 153 CR-3261-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 AMIT GIRI ...Petitioner Versus HARNEK SINGH AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: Mr. Aayush Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Chahar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. DEEPAK GUPTA , J. (ORAL) 1. Power of Attorney filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 is taken on record. Appearance has also been made on behalf of respondent No. 2. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement seeking permission to withdraw the present petition as the same has become infructuous, since the tubewell connection has already been supplied to the petitioner. 2. In view of the aforesaid statement, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE July 27, 2026 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2026.07.29 13.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document