Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : 29.06.2026 APHC010198932017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3167/2017 Between: 1. TOKALA SIVA PARVATHI, GUNTUR, W/O PAUL PRASAD, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, AGED 48 YEARS., RESIDENT OF ISRAEL PET, NEAR MANIPURAM RAILWAY GATE, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SOPARALA RAVINDRA REDDY PRAKASAM DIST ANR, S/O S.V.KRISHNA REDDY, HINDU, AGED 47 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. KURRI RAJESWARI, W/O SEETHARAMI REDDY, HINDU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS/O#15-4-121, RAJESWARI FANCY AND GENERAL STORES, 1/3RD CROSS ROAD, NEAR MASJID, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order E.A.83/2016 in E.A.827/2009 in E.P.902/2006 IN 0.S.1897/2005 dated 21-06-2017 without giving opportunity to the petitioner to submit his case, instead of refusing IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 4176 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant of stay of the operation of the Orders in EA No.83/2016 dt.21.07.2017 in EA No.27/2009 in EP No.902/2006 in OS NO.1897/2005 on the file of Hon'ble Principle Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the main Revision and may pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PITCHOONOORI SUNDARAM NAGARAJAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K H V SIVA KUMAR The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3167 OF 2017 ORDER: 1. When the matter was taken up on 22.06.2026, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was adjourned to 25.06.2026 with a direction to list under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. 2. None appeared even today when the matter is taken up. 3. Since the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ and the petitioner did not evince any interest to prosecute this matter, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter any further. Hence, this civil revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall also stand dismissed. No costs. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date:25.06.2026 SP Whether the order is: Speaking Yes Reasoned No Reportable No Non-reportable Yes