Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 344 (UTT)

GEETA PANT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1498/2024 · 2026-02-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:739 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1498/2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is serving as Assistant Teacher in Elementary Education Department. She was transferred from Govt. Primary School, Hathikhal, Haldwani to Govt. Primary School, Kalaagar, Okhalkanda, District Nainital vide order dated 12.07.2024. Challenging her transfer, petitioner filed this writ petition. 3. Coordinate Bench of this Court passed an interim order, on the strength of which, petitioner is still continuing at the original place of her posting. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s transfer is bad, as it is in violation of Section 3(d) and 7(d) of Transfer Act, 2017. 5. Learned State Counsel, per contra, submits that petitioner has served in accessible (sugam) places for more than 15 years, therefore, as per Transfer Act, she 2026:UHC:739 became liable to be transferred to a durgam place. He, therefore, submits that petitioner’s transfer was made strictly as per provisions of Transfer Act, 2017. 6. Transfer is an incidence of service. Admittedly, petitioner’s transfer was made as per the conditions of her service. This Court is not inclined to go into the issues raised by petitioner, especially violation of the Transfer Act. 7. Having regard to the facts of the case, this Court thinks it fit to dispose of the writ petition by permitting petitioner to approach the competent authority. 8. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to the competent authority. If he makes representation within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within six weeks thereafter. 9. For a period of eight weeks or till decision is taken, whichever is earlier, status quo, qua petitioner’s posting shall be maintained. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.02.2026 Mahinder/ 2026:UHC:739