[2026:RJ-JP:11100] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2942/2026 Ajay S/o Meethalal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sindoli, Tehsil - Dausa, Presently Kundal, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritesh Jain with Ms. Poonam Mishra Mr. Ramdeo Arya For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 337/2022 registered at Police Station Sadar Dausa District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 3/25 and 7/25 of Arms Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 3/25, 7/25 and 35 of Arms Act dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is aged 22 years. It is submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter, and he has not committed any such offence. It is submitted that in other matter, he is regularly appearing before the concerned Court. It is also submitted that qua the co-accused- Dharmendra and Pawan the [2026:RJ-JP:11100] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2942/2026] charge-sheet was filed and subsequently they were acquitted vide order dated 14.08.2025. It is submitted that applicant is behind bars ever-since 04.02.2026. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application and submitted that cartridges were recovered from the accused, due to which provisions of the Arms Act are invoked. It is submitted that applicant was absconding for a long period of time. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that applicant is aged 22 years; that applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter, as submitted; that applicant is behind bars ever-since 04.02.2026; that qua co-accused- Dharmendra and Pawan charge-sheet was filed and subsequently they were acquitted vide order dated 14.08.2025, and without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ajay S/o Meethalal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /68