MOHAMMAD JAMALUDDIN @ JAMAL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
CRL.P/7845/2026 · 2026-08-13
S Vishwajith Shetty
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34388 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34388 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7845 OF 2026 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7882 OF 2026
IN CRL.P No. 7845/2026:
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMAD JAMALUDDIN @ JAMAL S/O K. BAVA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT D.NO.2-152, KANTHARABETTU AKODI HOUSE, PERMANKI ULAIBETTU MANGALURU, D.K DISTRICT - 574145. …PETITIONER (BY SRI LETHIF B, ADV.) AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BAJPE POLICE STATION D.K DISTRICT, REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL IN CRIME NO. 63/2026 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 303(2) OF BNS SECTION 4, 5, 12 OF KARNATAKA PREVENTION OF COW SLAUGHTER AND CATTLE PRESERVATION ACT 2020 SECTION 11(A), 11(D), OF PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT SECTION 192(A) OF IMV ACT AND SECTION 4, 25-1(B) (b) OF ARMS ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC VI COURT, MANGALURU.
Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
IN CRL.P NO. 7882/2026:
BETWEEN:
NISARUDDIN S/O. NIZAMUDDIN AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT D.NO.135/7, NEAR BADRIYA JUMMA MASJID, KONCHANA PEJAWARA POST BAJPE VILLAGE, MANGALURU TALUK D.K. DISTRICT - 574 142. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI LETHIF B, ADV.)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BAJPE POLICE STATION D.K DISTRICT, REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.63/2026 BAJPE POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 303(2) OF BNS SECTION 4, 5, 12 OF KARNATAKA PREVENTION OF COW SLAUGHTER AND CATTLE PRESERVATION ACT 2020 SECTION 11(A), 11(D) OF PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT SECTION 192(A) OF IMV ACT AND SECTION 4, 25-1(B) (b) OF ARS ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC VI COURT, MANGALURU.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.63/2026 registered by Bajpe Police Station, Mangaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) and 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023, Sections 4, 5 and 12 of the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Prevention Act, 2020, Sections 11(A) and 11(D) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Section 192(A) of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Sections 4 and 25-1(B)(b) of the Arms Act, 1959, are before this Court in these two petitions filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, seeking regular bail. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. FIR in Crime No.63/2026 was registered by Bajpe Police Station, Mangaluru City, against unknown persons based on the first information dated 18.03.2023 received from Latha K N, police officer attached to Bajpe Police Station. During the course of investigation of the case, petitioners were arrested on 19.03.2026 and remanded to judicial custody. Their bail applications filed before the Trial Court in Crl.Misc.No.296/2026
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
and Crl.Misc.No.304/2026 were rejected on 28.04.2026. Therefore, they are before this Court. 4. In the first information dated 18.03.2026, it is stated that on 18.03.2026 when the first informant, who is a police officer, was on duty, she received information that cattle were being illegally transported in a Fortuner car. Immediately thereafter, first informant along with her staff had gone to the alleged spot where the accused persons were loading the cattle into the Fortuner car. After seeing the police, accused persons allegedly escaped and four cows which were loaded in the fortuner car were rescued. During the course of investigation, petitioners were arrested and remanded to judicial custody. It appears that subsequently considering the fact that petitioners are involved in other criminal cases, the offence punishable under Section 111 of BNS, 2023, was also invoked in the present case. It is not in dispute that in all the other criminal cases registered against the petitioners, they have been enlarged on bail. List of criminal cases registered against the petitioners is available on record.
According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, in none of the criminal cases registered against the petitioners,
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
the minimum punishment for the alleged offences is imprisonment for a period of three years or more. 5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Brijesh Singh alias Arun Kumar and Another - (2017) 10 SCC 779, in paragraph No.33, has observed as follows:-
"33. FIR No. 122 of 2010 is registered under Sections 341, 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Section 341 IPC is punishable with a maximum sentence of one month, though it is a cognizable offence. Section 506 IPC is a non-cognizable offence which was made a cognizable offence by a notification issued by the Delhi Government. This notification was quashed by the High Court of Delhi on 13-1-2004 [Narendra Kumar v. State, 2004 SCC OnLine Del 17 : (2004) 72 DRJ 620] . A second Notification for the same purpose was issued by the Delhi Government on 31-3-2004 which was challenged in WP (C) No. 2596 of 2007. The High Court of Delhi initially stayed [Rajeev Mehra v. State, 2007 SCC OnLine Del 1200 : (2007) 143 DLT 432] and ultimately struck down the second notification on 18-1-2016 [Rajeev Mehra v. State, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6575] . As such, Section 506 IPC was a non-cognizable offence at the date of registration of the FIR and filing of the charge-sheet. Only an unlawful activity which is a cognizable offence punishable with minimum sentence of three years or
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
more would be a continuous unlawful activity under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act. Hence, FIR No. 122 of 2010 cannot be taken into account."
6.
Sofaras the other offences invoked against the petitioners are concerned, the maximum punishment for the same is imprisonment for a period of seven years. Petitioners are in custody in the present case for the last more than four months. 7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Prabhakar Tewari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another - (2020) 11 SCC 648, has observed that a person's criminal antecedents alone cannot be a sole ground to reject his prayer for grant of bail, if he is otherwise found entitled for the same. 8. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the prayer made by the petitioners for grant of regular bail needs to be answered affirmatively, subject to appropriate conditions. 9. The petitions are allowed. The petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.63/2026 registered by Bajpe Police Station, Mangaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) and 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023, Sections 4,
- 7 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
5 and 12 of the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Prevention Act, 2020, Sections 11(A) and 11(D) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Section 192(A) of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Sections 4 and 25- 1(B)(b) of the Arms Act, 1959, subject to the following conditions:
a) Petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;
b) The petitioners shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts their appearance for valid reasons;
c) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;
d) The petitioners shall not involve in similar offences in future;
e) The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the case registered against them is
disposed off.
- 8 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010376392026 NC: 2026:KHC:43366 CRL.P No. 7845 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7882 of 2026
f) The petitioners are directed to appear before the Station House Officer, Bajpe Police Station, Mangaluru City, on the first and third Sunday of every month between 10.00 a.m. to 01.00 p.m. and mark their attendance, for a period of one year from the date of their release from custody in the present case.
Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32