Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34384 (CAL)

RAHUL QURESHI @ RAHUL KHURASHI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1701/2026 · 2026-08-20

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 795. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (NDPS) 1701 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Nimta Police Station Case No. 132 of 2025 dated 06.04.2025 under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of : Rahul Qureshi @ Rahul Khurashi ……Petitioner. Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra Ms. Paramita Mukherjee ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Ranojoy Chatterjee Mr. Prabal Das ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated on alleged recovery of 1.8 litres of Codeine Mixture and is in custody for 1 year 4 months. Although, charge sheet has been submitted but there has been no progress in the case. State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted the memorandum of evidence. The memorandum of evidence reflects the previous antecedents of the petitioner wherein 9 criminal cases have been registered against him. Out of which 3 are murder cases with Arms Act and one NDPS Case. 2 Having considered the antecedents of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (NDPS) 1701 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. A copy of the memorandum of evidence be handed over to the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)