- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283842019 NC: 2026:KHC:42276 CRL.P No. 5716 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5716 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.SUBHASHINI GUNASHEKAR D/O LATE M K GUNASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/O NO 269, W MAIN STREET APARTMENT 2D NORTH BOROUGH MASSACHUSETTS - 01532 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2. SMT.DIVYA RUPINI GUNASHEKAR D/O LATE M K GUNASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT # 45467 DOGWOOD COURT SHELBY TOWNSHIP MICHIGAN - 48317 UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA. 3. SMT.DEEPA DARSHINI GUNASHEKAR D/O LATE M K GUNASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT ST JOHANN 6 APARTMENT NO.327 ERLANGEN BAYERN - 91056 GERMANY. 4. SRI GANDHI BABU S/O SRI VELAYUDHAN PILLAI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O NO.37 MEG OFFICERS COLONY Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283842019 NC: 2026:KHC:42276 CRL.P No. 5716 of 2019 BANASWADI ROAD BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE - 560 033. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI CHRISTOPHER NOEL A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MAHILA POLICE STATION MYSORE CITY REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE. 2. SMT.SNEHA M D/O MANOHARA AND G SHEELA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO 429 17TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS ALLANAHALLI LAYOUT MYSORE - 570 011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHESHA P., HCGP FOR R1; SMT. J.S.NALINI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 06.03.2019 IN CR.NO.32/2019 FILED BY THE WOMEN POLICE STATION, MYSURU CITY AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., JLB ROAD, MYSURU CITY FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S 498(A) R/W 34 OF IPC AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 4 AND ACCUSED NO.3 TO 6. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283842019 NC: 2026:KHC:42276 CRL.P No. 5716 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo stating that during pendency of above petition, parties have settled their dispute before trial Court, rendering above petition infructuous. 2. Taking memo on record, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17