Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34367 (ORI)

BISWAJITA SETHI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/20470/2026 · 2026-09-10

M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.20470 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010469052026 Biswajita Sethi …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nath, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Ms. Suman Pattanayak, Additional Government Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO ORDER 10.09.2026 (Hybrid Mode) Order No. 01. 1. The Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer: “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to; I) Issue Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 shall not be quashed and thereby quashing the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 under Annexure- 4 ; II) Direct the opposite parties to restore petitioner to the promotional post of Revenue Inspector with all consequential service and financial benefits; III) Pass such order (S) / direction (s) as deemed fit and proper in the bonafide interest of Justice; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner p. 2 Amit as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 2. Memo of date is filed by the learned counsel, Mr. Mohapatra which states thus” “During pendency of the aforesaid case petitioner got the benefits as prayed for and petitioner does not want not to proceed the case. Hence the same may be withdrawn as not press.” (sic) The memo shall be taken on record and scanned copy be updated. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has no objection for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge