ONKAR SINGH v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/7995/2025 · 2026-07-27
Pankaj Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34359 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34359 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[282]
Onkar Singh
Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab at Chandigarh Main Civil Secretariat, Sector 1, Chandigarh and others
Coram :
Present:
PANKAJ JAIN
[1]
that the order has been passed pursuant to the impugned in the present writ petition rendered infructuous. [2]
aforesaid fact. [3]
having been rendered infructuous. [4]
disposed off
27.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-7995 Date of Decision :
Onkar Singh
Versus Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab at Chandigarh Main Civil Secretariat, Sector 1, Chandigarh and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Mr. Vikas Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate ****
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the respondents submit that in view of the fact that the order has been passed pursuant to the impugned in the present writ petition rendered infructuous.
Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid fact.
Consequently, the present writ petition is having been rendered infructuous.
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands
disposed off.
27.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned
Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 7995-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.07.2026
…Petitioner Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab at Chandigarh Main Civil Secretariat, Sector 1,
….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioner. Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab Advocate for respondent No.4. Counsel for the respondents submit that in view of the fact that the order has been passed pursuant to the remand order, which was impugned in the present writ petition, the writ petition has been Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No
Counsel for the respondents submit that in view of the fact remand order, which was has been Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the as All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.29 11:01 I agree to specified portions of this document