Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34353 (KAR)

SMT SHILPA v. SRI K M PUTTEGOWDA

WP/6798/2022 · 2026-07-31

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010143302022 NC: 2026:KHC:40204 WP No. 6798 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6798 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT SHILPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, W/O MARIGOWDA, D/O LATE B PUTTASWAMY R/AT THURUGANUR VILLAGE T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. NATARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI K M PUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE K B MUGAPPA, KETHUPURA VILLAGE T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 101 2. SMT SHIVAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O LATE B PUTTASWAMY R/AT KETHUPURA VILLAGE T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 101 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010143302022 NC: 2026:KHC:40204 WP No. 6798 of 2022 3. SMT VEENA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O A T MANJUNATH D/O LATE B PUTTASWAMY R/AT 7TH CROSS MADHANAYAKA NAGAR, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 101 4. SMT SHEELA P AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, W/O LOKESHA D/O LATE B PUTTASWAMY R/AT NO 12-B HOSA HUNDI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 008 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH H.V., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT T.NARASIPURA ON MAINTAINABILITY DATED 15.09.2021 IN O.S.NO.243/2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND MAY BE PLEASED TO DISMISS O.S.NO.243/2014 ON ITS FILE AS PRAYED FOR ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010143302022 NC: 2026:KHC:40204 WP No. 6798 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition renders infructuous. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6