Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3435 (UTT)

GIRIJA NANDAN BHATT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/984/2026 · 2026-04-18

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.984 of 2026 Girija Nandan Bhatt …………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Mansi Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned D.A.G. for the State. 3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner feeling aggrieved by the order passed by respondent no.3-District Magistrate/Licensing Authority, Nainital, whereby the foreign liquor shop allotted to respondent no.4 was shifted from Bajoon to Kaladhungi Road. 4. On the face of it the said order has not been challenged by the petitioner in the present writ petition. 5. Even otherwise if the petitioner who claims to be one of the allottees of the foreign liquor shop at Kaladhungi, he may prefer an appeal against the order passed by the respondent no.3-District Magistrate/Licensing Authority, Nainital, before the Excise Commissioner under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910. 6. In such view of the matter, this Court declines to interfere in the matter. 7. Accordingly writ petition stands dismissed in limine; however it is open to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available to him under law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.04.2026 SK