[2026:RJ-JP:10874] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 3781/2026 Nitesh Tongaria S/o Shri Kesar Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Manoharpura, Kachhi Basti Plot No. 787, Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur (Raj.) (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Girish Khandelwal Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.156/2025 registered with the Police Station Kotwali Sawaimadhopur, District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Sections 318(2), 316(2) and 352 of B.N.S., 2023. 2. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of receiving money from the complainant for seeking government job for the complainant. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to pay the amount, which is said to have been received by him from the complainant. He further submits that for making payment of the received amount, a Cheque bearing [2026:RJ-JP:10874] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3781/2026] No.000011 of Punjab and Sind Bank, of amount of Rs.82,000/- is being handed over to the complainant, who is present in person before the Court. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this second bail application. 4. The learned counsel for the complainant submits that if the accused-petitioner is paying the amount received by him from the complainant then the complainant has no objection, if the petitioner is released on bail. 5. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the accused-petitioner has handed over the Cheque bearing No.000011 of Punjab and Sind Bank, of amount of Rs.82,000/- to the complainant, who is present before the Court and which is said to have been received by the petitioner from the complainant, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:10874] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3781/2026] Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /234