Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3435 (JHR)

EMELI MARANDI ALIAS AIMELI MARANDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1243/2026 · 2026-04-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10167 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1243 of 2026 ------ Emeli Marandi @ Aimeli Marandi, aged about 29 years, Son of Late Mangal Marandi, Resident of Village –Jitpur (Barasarsa), P.O. –Bichmahal, P.S. –Littipara, District –Pakur, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 09.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 205 of 2025 arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No.56 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 805 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and snatched the bag containing Rs.6,45,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner on Test Identification Parade, as mentioned in para-12 of the bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.08.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused persons have already been admitted to bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 14.01.2026 in B.A. No. 11279 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, in connection with S.T. Case No. 205 of 2025 arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No.56 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 805 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09.04.2026 Sonu/