21.08.2026 Sl.No. 26 Ct. 39 Allowed chanchal In The High Court At Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRM (A) No. 2037 of 2026 In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/in connection with GR Case No. 2215 of 2025 arising out of Uluberia Police Station Case No. 389 of 2025 dated 12.08.2025 under Section 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/110/351(2)/3(5) of BNS Act. -And- In the matter of : Javed Rahaman Mondal. … Petitioner Mr. Debabrata Sardar ….for the petitioner Mr. Narattam Acharyya ……..for the State 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case due to long standing property dispute amongst the neighbors. He further submits that other co- accused persons namely Khadija Khan and Jasmina Khatun were granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Judge. He prays for anticipatory bail on parity ground. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State produces the case diary as well as the memo of evidence. He further relies on the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS and injury report. He opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Memo of evidence, filed by the State, is taken on record. 4. Having heard the learned counsels for the respective parties and on perusal of the materials available on record as well as the case diary, including statement recorded under Section 2 180 of the BNSS and injury report, this Court finds that the injury is simple in nature. In view of the facts, this court is of the opinion that this is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner as there is no need for custodial interrogation/detention. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Javed Rahaman Mondal is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. In the event the petitioner fail to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 8. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. 9. Case diary be returned. 10. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. 11. Concerned Department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )