1 2026:CGHC:10965 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 648 of 2026 Ansika Dubey D/o Diwakar Dubey Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Kumharta, Tahsil Darima, District Surguja, C.G. ... Petitioner. Versus 1 - Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited A Government Of India, Enterprises, Through Its General Manager, H O 12 / E N F Maker Towers, Cuffe, Parade, Post Box No. 19949, Mumbai, Registered Office Bharat Bhawan, 4 And 6, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra 2 - Collector Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. 3 - Senior Regional Manager Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Shahid Veer Narayan Singh Complex, Gadhi Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 4 - General Manager Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, H O 12 / E N F Maker Towers, Cuffe, Parade, Post Box No. 19949, Mumbai, Registered Office Bharat Bhawan, 4 And 6, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra 5 - Chief Vigilance Officer Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, H O 12 / E N F Maker Towers, Cuffe, Parade, Post Box No. 19949, Mumbai, Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.03.03 17:08:57 +0530 2 Registered Office Bharat Bhawan, 4 And 6, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra 6 - Territory Manager (Retail) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Old Chhattisgarh Housing Board Building, Kalpana Vihar, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, C.G. 7 - Amit Jaiswal S/o Gyan Prakash Jaiswal Aged About 42 Years R/o Haridevendam Society, Gandhinagar, Ambikapur, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. ... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. Anoop Majumdar, Advocate. For Res No.1, 3, 4, 5, 6 : Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate. For Res No.2/State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Advocate. For Res No.7 : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 03/03/2026 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following reliefs:- "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly call for records pertaining to case of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set- aside the impugned letter dated 07.03.2024 prepared and executed in favour of private respondent and its related proceedings in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to be selected as successful bidder a separate letter of intent be prepared and executed for petitioner for establishing the retail outlet 3 dealership as per the advertisement 28/06/2023, in the interest of justice. 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition challenging the order issued by respondent No.1 in accordance with law. 3. On due consideration, prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay