Neutral Citation:________________ Date of reserved for orders : Date of Pronouncement :22.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010234032017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2871/2017 Between: 1. B BHANU MYTHILI, KRISHNA DIST, W/O SOBHANADRI ARYA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SUBBA RAO GUNTUR DIST 4 OTHERS, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O MURTHY FASHIONS, LALAPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. TADIKONDA SIVA SURYA PRAKASA RAODECEASED D1, - 3. TADIKONDA RAM KISHORE D2, S/O LATE SIVA PRAKASH RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 13-3-19, 2ND AND 3RD LINES, GUNTURIVARI THOTA, GUNTUR 4. TADIKONDA SRINIVAS KISHORE D3, S/O LATE SIVA SURYA PRAKASH RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 13-3-19, 2ND AND 3RD LINES, GUNTURIVARI THOTA. 2 GUNTUR. 5. GOLLA NARAYANA MURTHY AUCTION PURCHASER, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSIENSS, R/O MURTHY FAHIONS, LALAPET, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the order and decree Dt:31-01-2017 in E.A.No. 230/2011 in E.P.No. 235/2003 in O.S.No. 502/1993 on the file of the IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 3807 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all proceedings in O.S.No. 502 of 1993 on the file of the IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2017(CRPMP 16574 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIREESH BABU VEMULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2871/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order and decree Dt:31.01.2017 in E.A.No. 230 of 2011 in E.P.No. 235 of 2003 in O.S.No.502 of 1993 on the file of the IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner on the earlier occasion i.e., on 18.06.2026. Hence, this Court posted the matter to today under the caption ‘For Dismissal”. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. It is observed that the present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order and decree dated 31.01.2017 passed in 2017 in E.A.No. 230 of 2011 in E.P.No. 235 of 2003 in O.S.No.502 of 1993. No interim orders were granted by the trial court. In the absence of any interim orders, the trial court might have been proceeded further since the EP is of the year 2003. Therefore, no cause survives for further adjudication in this Revision petition and the Revision Petition becomes infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 5 40 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:2871/2017 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP