Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010041892021 NC: 2026:KHC:41802 MFA No. 3929 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3929 OF 2021(MV-I) BETWEEN:
MUBARAK S/O KALANDAR SAB AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, SINCE, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER KALANDAR SAB AGED 39 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE WORK R/O MALLKERE VILLAGE, (MALALKERE VILLAGE) DAVANAGERE TQ & DIST-577006 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. G.J.SUNKAPUR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR, A.M.ARCADE, NEAR VIDYARTHI BHAVAN, C.G.HOSPITAL ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 001. Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010041892021 NC: 2026:KHC:41802 MFA No. 3929 of 2021
2. CHANDRAKANTHA S/O RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, OWNER OF TRACTOR BEARING REG.NO.KA17/TB-5457 R/O MALALKERE CAMP DAVANAGERE TALUK-577001
3.
PATEL G.B.
S/O DHANYAKUMAR G.B.
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, DRIVER OF TRACTOR BEARING REG.NO.KA17/TB-5457 R/O SHYAGALE VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK-577 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MUNIRAJA N.K, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.12.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO. 915/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010041892021 NC: 2026:KHC:41802 MFA No. 3929 of 2021
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT
This Court on 10.04.2026 passed the following order:
"Learned counsel for the appellant is present. None appears for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the appellant is
directed to comply the office objection by the next date of hearing, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed automatically. Post this matter after Summer Vacation, 2026."
Office note reveals that despite said order office objection has not been complied. In such circumstance, no further orders required. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3