Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3433 (JHR)

MANOJ MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1219/2026 · 2026-04-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10180 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1219 of 2026 1. Manoj Mahto, son of late Sudarshan Mahto, aged about 45 years, resident of Village- Kapsio, P.O. Sarsa, P.S. Palajori, District- Dumka, Jharkhand 2. Sudarshan Mahato, aged about 60 years, son of Bigu Mahato, resident of Village- Kapsio, P.O. Sarsa, P.S. Palajori, District- Dumka, Jharkhand 3. Niwash Verma @ Chunna Verma @ Niwas Kumar Verma, aged about 28 years, son of Rupesh Verma, resident of Village- Manjhiladih, P.O. Sarwan, P.S. Sarwan, District- Dumka, Jharkhand … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, Spl.P.P. ----- 03/09.04.2026 The matter relates to Complaint (O.C.R.) Case No.2572/2023, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application as the matter is arising out of complaint case with liberty to move before the learned Court by way of filing regular bail petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no objection. 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. It is made clear that if the petitioners move before the learned Court by way of filing regular bail petition, that will be considered by the learned Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced to this order. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 9th April, 2026 Ajay/