Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34328 (CHH)

RAMU JAISWAL @ PRAKASH KUMAR JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3055/2023 · 2026-08-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010207732023 2026:CGHC:37971 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3055 of 2023 1 - Ramu Jaiswal @ Prakash Kumar Jaiswal S/o Late Narendra Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 42 Years Caste Kalaar, R/o Dewangan Mohalla, Ward No. 03, Korba (C.G.) Through Power Of Attorney Sanjiv Jaiswal @ Sanjay Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Devi Prasad Jaiswal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o House No. 24/8, Ward No. 02, Tulsi Nagar, D.D.M. Road, Distt. Korba (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawa, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Sub Divisional Officer Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 3 - Tehsildar Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4 - Mukesh Dewangan Tehsildar, Korba Distt. Korba (C.G.) 5 - Amar Jaiswal Assistant Sub Inspector (Police) Manikpur, Chowki, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Asha Sharma W/o Late Ramesh Sharma Aged About 68 Years Caste Brahman, R/o Matra Chhaya Mission Road, Korba, Tehsil And Distt. Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Amit Kumar Chaki, Advocate. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/08/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to respondent no. 3,4 and 5 to pay compensation of Rs. 25 lakhs and restore the possession of the petitioner. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction specially against the respondent no.1 to initiate an enquiry against the respondent no.4 for his illegal act of throwing and evacuating the petitioner by illegal manner. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat