Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010080072019
2026:CGHC:38710
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 31 of 2019 1 - Abdul Yusuf Khan S/o Abdul Hafiz Khan Aged About 49 Years Through Abdul Ajam Khan S/o Abdul Akbar Khan, R/o Madarsa Wala Road, Near, Kadri, Kitab Ghar, Baijanathpara, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.(Defendent No. 2) 2 - Abdul Ajam Khan S/o Shri Abdul Akbar Khan Aged About 27 Years R/o Madarsa Wala Road, Near Kadri Kitab Ghar, Baijnanathpara, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No.3)
... Appellants versus 1 - Motiram S/o Keruram Satnami Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Kotni, Post Palaud, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 2 - Smt. Jugri Bai D/o Keruram Satnami Aged About 66 Years W/o Late Hiraman Satanmi, R/o Village Mujgahan, Tahsil Dharsinwa District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Rajbai D/o Keruram Satnami Aged About 60 Years W/o Budharu Satnami, R/o Village Tarra, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.
2 4 - Smt. Chandrabai D/o Keruram Satnami Aged About 58 Years W/o Jagat Satnami, R/o Village Pacheda, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
5 - Smt. Chandrautin Bai D/o Keruram Satanmi Aged About 55 Years W/o Samliya Satnami, R/o Village Arand, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband. Chhattisgarh. 6 - Bhagwan Das S/o Manguram Satnami Aged About 55 Years 7 - Prandas S/o Manguram Satnami Aged About 47 Years 8 - Hariram S/o Manguram Satnami Aged About 37 Years No. 6 to 8 all residents of Village Tila, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur. No. 2 to 8 through general power of attorney holder Motiram, aged about 66 years, S/o Keruram Satnami, R/o Village Kotni, Post Palaud, Tahsil Mandir Hasaud, Aarang, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiffs) 9 - Mohan S/o Motiram Satnami Aged About 45 Years R/o Charauda, Post Belar, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No.1) 10 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh,(Defendent No.4 )
... Respondents For Appellants : Mr. Rajesh Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent No.9/State. : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer.
3 Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J Order on Board (01st September, 2026) At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that this appeal has become infructuous as subject execution proceeding has already been completed.
02. In view of above, the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/ (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Khan
MOHD AKHTAR KHAN Digitally signed by MOHD AKHTAR KHAN Date: 2026.09.01 16:27:50 +0530