Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3432 (JK)

M/S PARDEEP ELECTRICALS AND BULDING PVT. LTD. TH. PARDEEP JAIN v. UNION OF INDIA TH. ENGINEER IN CHIEF, MILITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS

Arb P/99/2026 · 2026-09-30

Sanjay Parihar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No. 01 Supp. 1 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU (Through Virtual Mode) Arb P No. 99/2026 Caveat No. 2080/2026 M/s Pardeep Electricals & Building Private Limited …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Arun Dev Singh, Advocate Vs. Union of India And Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 30.09.2026 Caveat No. 2080/2026 Caveat stands discharged. Arb P No. 99/2026 1. It is submitted by the ld. counsel for the petitioner that the Arbitrator has already heard the matter and reserved the proceedings for pronouncement of final award. However, till date award has not been drawn by the time the period of Arbitral Tribunal too has expired. 2. In view of the submission made and for the reasons recorded in the application, same is allowed. The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for disposal of such proceedings is extended for another two months from the date it last expired i.e., 06.09.2026 enabling the ld. Arbitrator to conclude the proceedings. 3. Disposed of in that manner. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 30.09.2026 Akhil Dev