M/S PARDEEP ELECTRICALS AND BULDING PVT. LTD. TH. PARDEEP JAIN v. UNION OF INDIA TH. ENGINEER IN CHIEF, MILITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
Arb P/99/2026 · 2026-09-30
Sanjay Parihar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3432 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3432 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 01
Supp. 1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU (Through Virtual Mode) Arb P No. 99/2026 Caveat No. 2080/2026 M/s Pardeep Electricals & Building Private Limited …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Arun Dev Singh, Advocate Vs. Union of India And Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 30.09.2026 Caveat No. 2080/2026 Caveat stands discharged. Arb P No. 99/2026
1. It is submitted by the ld. counsel for the petitioner that the Arbitrator has already heard the matter and reserved the proceedings for pronouncement of final award. However, till date award has not been drawn by the time the period of Arbitral Tribunal too has expired.
2. In view of the submission made and for the reasons recorded in the application, same is allowed. The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for disposal of such proceedings is extended for another two months
from the date it last expired i.e., 06.09.2026 enabling the ld. Arbitrator to conclude the proceedings.
3.
Disposed of in that manner.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 30.09.2026 Akhil Dev