Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34302 (CHH)

VIJAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6405/2026 · 2026-08-31

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010314812026 2026:CGHC:38657 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6405 of 2026 1 - Vijay Kumar Singh S/o Late Indrasun Singh Aged About 53 Years Presently Posted As Accountant At District Project Office, Samagra Shiksha, Baikuntpur, Distt.- Korea (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction (Dpi), Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, District- Korea, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mission/managing Director Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (Formerly Ssa), Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Project Coordinator Samagra Shiksha, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Vijay Ojha, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Respective Respondents : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 01/09/2026 AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.09.02 10:40:34 +0530 2 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondents authorities to regularize his services on the post of Accountant from the date of his initial appointment with all consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who is working on the post of Accountant, has been in continuous service since 07.09.1998, i.e., for more than two decades. It is further submitted that the concerned department has already sought the approval and concurrence of the Finance Department for the regularization of the petitioner on his post. However, the petitioners' claim/representation for regularization has not yet been decided by the competent authority. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as respondent Nos. 4 to 5 submits that, if the petitioners' claim/representation (Annexure P-3) is still pending before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider and decide the 3 petitioners' claim/representation by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep