Mani Kant Choudhary and Ors v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/15144/2016 · 2026-01-12
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34296 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34296 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15144 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Mani Kant Choudhary and Ors
2. Phulendra Kumar Choudhary. 3. Bipin Kumar Choudhary. All sons of Late Ram Prakash Choudhary, Resident of village Pauri, P.S. Bahera, District Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Collector, Samastipur. 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Rosera, Samastipur. 4. The Anchal Adhikari Rosera, Samastipur. 5. The Circle Officer Rosera, Samastipur. 6. Lukhiya Devi wife of Late Baue Paswan @ Baue Lal Paswan. 7. Nunu Lal Paswan. 8. Ram Chandra Paswan. 9. Bhullar Paswan. 10. Dilip Paswan. All sons of Late Baue Lal Paswan. 11. Rajiv Paswan. 12. Mahavir Paswan. 13. Phulo Paswan. All three Sons of Late Anik Paswan. 14. Most Lal Muni Devi wife of Late Ramdeo Paswan. 15. Sheela Paswan. 16. Saroj Paswan. 17. Lallu Paswan. 18. Manoj Paswan All sons of Late Ramdeo Paswan. All residents of village P.O. Bhirha P.S. Rosera District Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lovekush Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy- Gp18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 12-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the
Patna High Court CWJC No.15144 of 2016(4) dt.12-01-2026 2/3 following relief(s):
“(a) for issuance of appropriate writ/order/direction including writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 14.12.2015 passed by the Anchal Adhikari Rosera in Basgit purcha case no.1/2015 (Annexure-3) by which he has ordered to issue amended Basgit purcha which is the part of Basgit Purcha case no.99/83-84 in favour of Most. Lukhiya Devi (Respondent no. 6). (b) For issuance of writ of mandamus directing the Respondents not to execute the impugned order dated 14.12.2015 passed by the Anchal Adhikari and to maintain the position of Status Quo as on today till disposal of title Suit no. 261/2015 pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Resera Samastipur between the parties in respect of the lands in question. (c) To issue/pass other any writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders as your lordships may deem fit and proper.”
3. In this case, jointness petition was to be filed with respect to respondent nos. 15 to 18 with respondent no. 13
Patna High Court CWJC No.15144 of 2016(4) dt.12-01-2026 3/3 pursuant to the order dated 13.10.2025. 4.
As it was a peremptory order and the compliance was not made within time, it got dismissed on 24.11.2025. 5. Allowing the petitioner to file an appropriate petition for restoration, the file stands consigned. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U