CWP-22025-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 152 PARMINDER SINGH BATH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. S. P. S. Khaira for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the concerned Police 12.06.2026 and learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Vacation Judge, Samrala Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) injunction filed by the petitioner against the 2. A perusal 12.06.2026, lea granted interim injunction defendant (respondent no.6 herein) property. Further, of Order 39 Rule 3 respondents no.4 and 5 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: PARMINDER SINGH BATH Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. S. P. S. Khaira, Advocate (Through Video for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the official respondents concerned Police authorities, to implement and and 24.06.2026, Annexurs P-1 and P learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Vacation Judge, Samrala Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Samrala filed by the petitioner against the sixth respondent A perusal of the paper book shows that , learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) granted interim injunction to the plaintiff (petitioner herein) (respondent no.6 herein) from dispossessing Further, a direction was also issued to make immediate compliance 39 Rule 3 CPC. Thereafter, vide subsequent no.4 and 5, Station House Officer and Assistant Sub Inspector, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22025-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA (Through Video Conferencing) Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. inter alia, seeking a writ of official respondents, State of Punjab and the , to implement and enforce the orders dated and P-2, respectively, passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Vacation Judge, Samrala and learned Samrala, in a suit for permanent sixth respondent. of the paper book shows that vide order dated Division)/Vacation Judge, Samrala, to the plaintiff (petitioner herein) restraining the dispossessing him from the suit also issued to make immediate compliance vide subsequent order dated 24.06.2026, , Station House Officer and Assistant Sub Inspector, seeking a writ of the the orders dated , passed by learned for permanent vide order dated , the him from the suit also issued to make immediate compliance , , Station House Officer and Assistant Sub Inspector, AMAN DUA 2026.07.27 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-22025-202 respectively, were petitioner for enforcement of order dated 3. In view thereof, t petition as the trial Court also filed an application seeking action order dated 12.06.2026 4. Dismissed. 20.07.2026 Ad 2026 -2- respectively, were directed to provide necessary police assistance for enforcement of order dated 12.06.2026 In view thereof, this Court finds no ground to entertain the s the trial Court is already seized of the matter application under Order 39 Rule 2 n against willful disobedience of the interim direction issued vide order dated 12.06.2026. Dismissed. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable necessary police assistance to the 12.06.2026. his Court finds no ground to entertain the of the matter, and the petitioner has 39 Rule 2-A read with Section 151 CPC of the interim direction issued vide (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No to the his Court finds no ground to entertain the and the petitioner has read with Section 151 CPC of the interim direction issued vide ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.27 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document