Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34291 (CHH)

PUSHPRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPPIL/95/2023 · 2026-08-31

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010355172023 2026:CGHC:38543-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPPIL No. 95 of 2023 Pushpraj Singh S/o Shri Vijay Bahadur Singh, Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No.11, Marwahi Road, Pendra, District Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Chief Controller Forest, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Divisional Forest Officer, District Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (Chhattisgarh) 4 - The Collector District Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Director, Mining Department, Indrawati Bhawan Block D, Second Floor, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Divisional Forest Officer, Marwahi Forest Division, Pendra Road, District Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Sahil Enterprises, Balmiki Chowk, Shanichari Padav, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumya Rai, Dy. G.A. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.09.01 15:37:21 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 01.09.2026 1. Heard Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, learned counsel for petitioner as well as Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent. 2. From perusal of the petition, it transpires that the petitioner has not deposited the security amount as per the Rules of the Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdrawn the present petition with liberty to file afresh after depositing the security amount. 4. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after depositing the security deposit as per High Court Rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet