1 CGHC010307472026 2026:CGHC:38684 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7584 of 2026 Harprasad S/o Shobharam Maravi Aged About 46 Years R/o Sirgitti, Police Station Sirgitti, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Chakarbhatha, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Kunwar Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 01.09.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.404/2026, registered at Police Station- Chakarbhatha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) & 47 of the Excise Act. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.09.01 15:41:02 +0530 2 2. As per the prosecution story, on 29.06.2026, Constables No. 1400 and 1251 allegedly recovered 22 litres of Mahua liquor from the possession of the applicant and co-accused Dil Singh Gond on the Main Road of Village Sarwani. Information regarding the said recovery was conveyed to the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police Station Chakarbhatha, who thereafter reached the spot and allegedly seized the aforesaid liquor. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 29.06.2026 and though the charge-sheet has already been filed, the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. He later submits that so far as criminal antecedents of the applicant is concerned, the applicant has no previous antecedent registered against him. He lastly submits that under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years, therefore, he prays grant of bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State/non-applicant opposes the bail application of the applicant and also the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, 3 nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against him, he is languishing in jail since 29.06.2026 and though the charge-sheet has already been filed, conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, as such, the Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Hence, the bail application of the applicant is allowed. 7. Let applicant, Harprasad, involved in Crime No.404/2026, registered at Police Station- Chakarbhatha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) & 47 of the Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail 4 during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 84 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section Section 209 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Manpreet