Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34285 (PNJ)

MANISH NAGPAL v. STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/34574/2026 · 2026-07-27

Vikram Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 CRM-M-34574-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 MANISH NAGPAL ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH .…Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Kanishka, Advocate for Mr. Sapan Seth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Bali, Addl. Public Prosecutor, U.T., Chandigarh. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, at this stage. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE July 27, 2026 Mani Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MANI KUMAR 2026.07.28 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document