Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34282 (MAD)

C.THILIPKUMAR v. The Tahsildar,

WP/21486/2026 · 2026-06-11

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21486 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 21486 of 2026 1. C.Thilipkumar S/o Chandrasekar, residing at No 34/68, 9th street, Z Block Anna Nagar, Chenani 600 040 2. Saraladevi W/o Thilpkumar, residing at No 34/68, 9th street, Z Block Anna Nagar, Chenani 600 040 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar, Kolathur Taluk, Chennai District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue patta in the petitioners name for their property at Old S. no 9/4 New Survey No 9/4B1A, present T.S. No 80/4, to an extent of 5328 Sq.ft., situated at Kolathur Village, Kolathur Taluk, Chennai District, by considering the petitioners Full Field patta Transfer Application dated 05.11.2025 within a time frame that will be fixed by this Honble Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21486 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Guruprasad, Govt’s counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 05.11.2025. 2. Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 05.11.2025 before the respondent, requesting for issuance of patta pertaining to the subject property in favour of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21486 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 05.11.2025 and after issuing due notice to all the parties concerned, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To The Tahsildar, Kolathur Taluk, Chennai District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21486 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 21486 of 2026 11-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis