Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3428 (ALL)

RAM CHANDAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/18430/2026 · 2026-05-04

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18430 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of non- bailable warrant dated 18.03.2026 issued in Criminal Case No.6568 of 2007 (State Vs. Radhey Shyam), arising out of Case Crime No.168 of 2007, under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Line Bazar, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. 3. Learned counsel for applicant confined his prayer only to the extent that the present application may be disposed of finally with a direction to the court concerned that in case applicant surrenders before it and applies for bail in pursuance of NBW order dated 18.03.2026, the same may be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law to which learned AGA has no objection. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and applies for bail in pursuance of NBW order dated 18.03.2026, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law. 5. However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant herein in the present case. May 5, 2026 Vivek Kr. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Rajbhar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Ram Chandar Maurya .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad