Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3426 (JHR)

HIRALAL RAJWAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2732/2026 · 2026-04-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:9662 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2732 of 2026 ------ Hiralal Rajwar, aged about 37 years, son of Bhola Rajwar, Resident of Village-Chatradih, Sutiarpara, P.O. & P.S.-Tinpahar, District- Sahibganj. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 332, 353, 504, 506, 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder Indrajit Kumar Das by assaulting him with lathi and danda. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-15 of this bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused has been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 02.04.2026 in B.A. No.2681 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.07.2025 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Rajmahal in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 06/04/2026 Abhiraj/