21.08.2026 DL-1 Court No.551 [Bench ID-266058] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 2378 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gangarampur Police Station Case No.602 of 2025 dated 07.09.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c )/23(c)/27A/28/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (corresponding to NDPS Case No.66 of 2025) pending in the Court of the Learned Special Judge (under NDPS Act)-cum-ADJ, 3rd Court, Dakshin Dinajpur at Balurghat. And In the matter of: Jiyarul Miah @ Jioyarul Rahaman ….petitioner Mr. Kaushik Choudhury, Advocate Mr. Dwaipayan Panda, Advocate …for the petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. PP Mr. Ayan Basu, Advocate Mr. Goutam Banerjee, Advocate … for the State 1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record. 2. It is submitted by the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of a statement made by the co-accused while in custody. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the present petitioner. Moreover, the investigation of the case has already ended in a charge sheet against the present petitioner as well as other accused persons. He prays for anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. From the materials contained in the memo of evidence as 2 well as from the materials placed with the record, it transpires that the narcotic contraband was seized from the possession of one Rubbel Miah @ Rubel Miya @ Ruyep Islam. The said Rubbel Miah @ Rubel Miya @ Ruyep Islam Mia was taken into custody along with the seized narcotic drugs. Subsequently, the aforesaid Rubbel Miah @ Rubel Miya @ Ruyep Islam was granted bail by this Court by an order passed on June 22, 2026 in CRM (NDPS) 790 of 2026. Nothing appears to have been recovered from the possession of the present petitioner. His name has transpired from the statement of the co-accused recorded while in custody. 5. In such circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to 3 this Court. 7. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. 8. C.R.M. (A) 2378 of 2026 is disposed of. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.08.21 17:15:06 +05'30'