R.Gunasekar v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons
WP Crl./1307/2026 · 2026-06-15
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34251 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34251 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:MHC:2133 WP Crl. No. 1307 of 2026 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP Crl. No. 1307 of 2026 and WPMP CRL. NO. 442 OF 2026 R.Gunasekar S/o.Raaghu, Pid No.196865, Convict Prisoner, Central Prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai - 600066. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Chennai Range, Prison Head Quarters, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 2. The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS and calling for the records bearing no.CP-PU1/368/2026-R2 dated 16.04.2026 passed by the Respondent no.2 granting 6 days emergency leave with escort and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant 6 days emergency leave by without escort for the petitioner namely Gunasekaran S/o.Raaghu aged about 65 years, Convict PID No.196865, Convict Prisoner confined in Central Prison-1 Puzhal, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Nadhiya For Respondent(s): Mr.C.R.Malarvannan, Counsel For Government Of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2026:MHC:2133 WP Crl. No. 1307 of 2026 __________ ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth, J.) The petitioner is aggrieved by the condition relating to imposition of escort while granting emergency leave of 6 days vide order dated 16.4.2026. 2. We have heard Ms.Nadhiya, learned counsel for petitioner and MR.C.R.Malarvannan, learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for the respondents. 3. The recommendation of the Probation Officer is favourable to the convict. That apart, the convict has also been asked to report everyday in the jurisdictional police station. 4. Most importantly, Mr.Malarvannan, does not have any serious objection to the removal of the condition for escort. 5. Thus, in light of the aforesaid, the grant of emergency leave of the aforesaid order shall be without escort and this writ petition is allowed as prayed for. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.] 15-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes ssm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2026:MHC:2133 WP Crl. No. 1307 of 2026 __________ To
1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Chennai Range, Prison Head Quarters, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 2. The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. 3.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2026:MHC:2133 WP Crl. No. 1307 of 2026 __________ DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. ssm WP Crl. No. 1307 of 2026 AND WPMP CRL. NO. 442 OF 2026 15-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis