Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3424 (CHH)

JHADIYAR ( JHADIYARAM ) v. RATIRAM

SA/80/2018 · 2026-01-14

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2500 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 80 of 2018 1. Jhadiyar ( Jhadiyaram ) S/o Boti Aged About 40 Years R/o Gram Mulmula Tahsil And District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 2. Prabhu S/o Boti Aged About 35 Years R/o Gram Mulmula Tahsil And District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh (Defendants), District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1. Ratiram S/o Lachchindhar Aged About 63 Years R/o Gram Mulmula Tahsil And District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff), District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh (Defendant), District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Bhavika Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. Santosh Soni, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 15/01/2026 1. On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the matter. Since no one is appearing, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.01.16 10:26:38 +0530 2 prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Consequently, the interim relief granted earlier in favour of the appellant stands vacated. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti