Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 40. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (M) 934 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Baruipur PS Case No. 981 of 2024 dated 26.06.2024 under Sections 376AB/376(2)(f)/376(2)(n)/323/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. And In the matter of : XXX
……Petitioner. Mr. Aminul Islam
Mr. Sourav Mukherjee
Ms. Ayasha Najrin
……for the Petitioner. Ms. Mehabuba Rahaman
….for the Defacto Complainant. Mr. Amal Kumar Datta
….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioner is in custody for 2 years and 1 month and the evidence of the victim has been completed, as such, according to the petitioner, he may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail, draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the minor. I have taken into account the evidence of the victim as well as the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS and also the progress of the case which is stated to be that only 2
2 witnesses out of 16 witnesses till date being examined. The offence alleged is grievous. However, as there is no possibility of the trial being concluded, on stringent conditions I am releasing the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Baruipur. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of South 24 Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, petitioner shall reside outside the jurisdiction of Baruipur Police Station till further orders of this Court. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 934 of 2026 is allowed. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)