IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 CWP-17497-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 SUKENDER ..... Petitioner Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. *** RAMESH KUMARI, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding Section 482 of Cr.P.C.) for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 22.04.2026 (Annexure P-6). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has recently filed a representation on 22.04.2026 before the Director General of Police, Haryana Police Panchkula (Annexure P-6) raising his grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 3 and 4 to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. POOJA SAINI 2026.07.28 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-17497-2026 (O&M) -2- 4. Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondents No. 3 and 4 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 22.04.2026 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioner, the official respondents would provide him adequate security in order to protect his life and liberty. 6. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. 27.07.2026 (RAMESH KUMARI) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No POOJA SAINI 2026.07.28 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment