1 CGHC010177722023 2026:CGHC:38900 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2502 of 2023 1 - Birendra Sahu S/o Late Bharosa Ram Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Village Murmunda, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ashok Kumar S/o Late Praja Chelak Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Village Murmunda, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Taran Bai W/o Sukhchand Aged About 72 Years R/o Murmunda, P.O. Murmunda, P.S. Nandini Nagar, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Dular S/o Chablu Aged About 51 Years R/o Murmunda, P.O. Murmunda, P.S. Nandini Nagar, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sub Divisional Officer Dhamdha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Tahsildar Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Naib Tahsildar Ahiwara, Tahsil Ahiwara, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Gram Panchayat Murmunga, P.O. Murmunda, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For State : Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, Dy. A.G. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.09.02 17:04:21 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 02.09.2026 1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the grievance raised by the petitioners has already been redressed by the concerned authorities and, therefore, no surviving cause of action now remains for adjudication by this Court. It is further submitted that in view of the subsequent developments and the relief having already been extended to the petitioners, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2 Learned State counsel fairly concurs with the aforesaid submission advanced on behalf of the petitioners and submits that nothing further survives for consideration in the present matter. 3 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions so made, this Court is of the opinion that since the grievance of the petitioners already stands redressed and no substantive issue survives for adjudication, continuation of the present proceedings would serve no useful purpose. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/-- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh