Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34211 (CAL)

SHAIKH KAISAR ABDUL MULTAB @ SK KAISAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/1804/2026 · 2026-08-21

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.292 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (A) 1804 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Watgunge Police Station Case No. 127 dated 03.06.2026 under Sections 135/138 of the Electricity Act, 2023. And In Re : Shaikh Kaisar Abdul Multab @ Sk. Kaisar ... Petitioner. Mr. Indranil Halder, Ms. Neha Singh ... For the Petitioner. Ms. Sreyashee Biswas ... For the CESC authority. Learned advocate appearing for the CESC authorities submits that they have received 50% of the provisional assessment from the present petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner viz., Shaikh Kaisar Abdul Multab @ Sk. Kaisar shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of eight weeks from date. 2 The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 1804 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)