SRI.G.SHIVA SHANKAR RAJU, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14084/2020 · 2026-06-24
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3421 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3421 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders Date of pronouncement Date of uploading APHC010214112020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE 25 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION N BETWEEN:
1. SRI.G.SHIVA SHANKAR RAJU, S/ AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, DESIGNATION PET, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 2. T.RAMA DEVI, C/ DESIGNATION SGT, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, R/O 24 BHIMARAJU GUTTA, IB
521456. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT . 4. THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDAPAH DISTRICT. Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026
: 29.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 14084/2020 SRI.G.SHIVA SHANKAR RAJU, S/o. G VENKATA SWAMY RAJU, ABOUT 60 YEARS, DESIGNATION PET, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. T.RAMA DEVI, C/o.T.RAJAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, DESIGNATION SGT, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, R/O 24-125, VIJAYAWADA - MYLAVARAM ROAD, BHIMARAJU GUTTA, IBRAHIMPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT . THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDAPAH DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO G VENKATA SWAMY RAJU, ABOUT 60 YEARS, DESIGNATION PET, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. .T.RAJAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, DESIGNATION SGT, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR ...PETITIONER(S) TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL MYLAVARAM ROAD, RAHIMPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT . THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, H.M.M HIGH SCHOOL, RLY KODUR TALUK, CUDAPAH DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent authorities with regard to not reckoning the unaided service rendered by the petitioners w.e.f 06.08.1984 to 01.11.1989, 28.11.1987 to 01.11.1989 for the purpose of Career Advancement Scheme and Automatic Advancement Scheme, in terms of Judgment passed in W.P.No.3460 of 2010 and batch dated 23.08.2017 by declaring the inaction is illegal, arbitrary and violative of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and revise the Pay of the Writ Petitioner and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
The Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to reckon the un-aided services rendered by the petitioners from 06.08.1984 to 01.11.1989; 28.11.1987 to 01.11.1989 for the purpose of Career Advancement Scheme and Automatic Advancement Scheme, in terms of
Judgment passed in W.P. No.3460 of 2010 and batch dated 23.08.2017.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has furnished the order dated 18.02.2026 in W.P. No.28699 of 2024. A coordinate Bench of this Court
disposed of the said Writ Petition recording the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P. Nos.3460 of 2010 and 19171 of 2015,
directed the respondents to revise the pay scales of all the petitioners for Aided Posts by taking into consideration of their services rendered in unaided post i.e. from the date of approval in their respective schools. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court to pass similar orders in the present Writ Petition.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has not refuted the same and stated that the issue is covered by the order in W.P. No.28699 of 2024.
4. Therefore, the present Writ petition is disposed of in terms of the
order dated 18.02.2026 in W.P. No.28699 of 2024, directing the respondents to revise the pay scales of the petitioners for Aided Posts by taking into consideration of their services rendered in unaided post i.e.
4
from the date of approval in their respective schools, as expeditiously as possible not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the
order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.06.2026
Harin
5
72 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
W.P.No. 14084 of 2020
Date: 25-06-2026
Harin Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable