Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34209 (MAD)

K Govindan v. State rep by The lnspector of Police

CRL OP/14735/2026 · 2026-06-11

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 14735 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 14735 of 2026 1. K Govindan No.84. Khadar Nagar, Narayanapuram Village, Unai Vaniyambadi Post, Anaicut Taluk, Vellore District- 632101 2. G Rani No.84. Khadar Nagar,Narayanapuram Village,Unai Vaniyambadi Post,Anaicut Taluk,Vellore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep by The lnspector of Police Anaicut Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No.47 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.47 of 2026 dated 22.04.2026 pending on the file of the Respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/S. HARINATH T C For Respondent(s): MR.N. PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 4(1)(A), 4(1)(c) of the Tamilnadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14735 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 in Crime No.47 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were found in illegal possession of 266 alcohol bottles. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implication in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners are husband and wife and that they are having 46 previous cases pending against them. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Considering the gravity of the offences and the fact that the petitioners are husband and wife, and are having 46 previous cases pending against them, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14735 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 11-06-2026 DRL To 1.The lnspector of Police Anaicut Police Station, Vellore District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14735 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 14735 of 2026 11-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis