Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34207 (KAR)

UNITED RACING AND BLOODSTOCK BREEDERS LTD v. THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER REGION-1

WP/24259/2022 · 2026-08-03

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010555222022 NC: 2026:KHC:40523 WP No. 24259 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 24259 OF 2022 (L-RES) BETWEEN: UNITED RACING AND BLOODSTOCK BREEDERS LTD., NO.107, PRESTIGE CENTRE POINT, NO.07, EDWARD ROAD, BENGALURU-560052, ENGAGED IN THE ACTIVITIES OF THROUGH BRED HORSES BREEDING REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C.K.SUBRAHMANYA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.C.PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER REGION-1, KARNATAKA STATE EMPLOYEES TRAINING CENTRE BUILDING, ROOM NOS.12 AND 13, FIRST FLOOR, MANJUNATHANAGARA, BAGALAKUNTE, BENGALURU-560073. 2. KUNIGAL STUD FARM EMPLOYEES UNION, MOSQUE ROAD, NEAR FORT, KUNIGAL, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572130. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR M., AGA FOR R1; SRI. L.MURALIDHAR PESHWA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010555222022 NC: 2026:KHC:40523 WP No. 24259 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.C.K.Subrahmanya., counsel on behalf of Sri.B.C.Prabhakar., for the petitioner; Sri.Rajakumar.M., Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1 and Sri.L.Muralidhar Peshwa., counsel for respondent No.2 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010555222022 NC: 2026:KHC:40523 WP No. 24259 of 2022 The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48