D/L825 07.08.2026 Bpg. Allowed C.R.M. (A) 1926 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Matia Police Station Case No.299 of 2026 dated 13.06.2026 under Sections 318(4)/336(2)/336(3)/340/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Farjana Parvin & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta Ms. Subhasri Chatterjee Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta. …for the petitioners. Ms. Arushi Rathore. …for the State. Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioners be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been unnecessarily foisted with the present litigation in respect of the payments which the de facto complainant was supposed to receive, the same has been disbursed. The issue presently is restricted only to the no-objection certificate for the business in respect of the water plant. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail but submits that there are documents to substantiate so far as the 2 receipt of the money is concerned bank transaction which is a substantial sum of money. Having considered the dispute and difference so far as the transactions are concerned primarily relate to civil dispute and the no-objection certificate, if any, if the same is forged for operating water plant is the only subject matter of investigation, the same may not require custodial detention of the present petitioners. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, Farjana Parvin and Sk. Humayun Kabir shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, petitioner no.2 shall report to the investigating officer of the case within a period of 10 days from date and thereafter all subsequent dates fixed by the investigating officer of the case. So far as the petitioner no.1 is concerned, she would make herself available as and when required by the investigating officer of the case. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(A)1926 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)